Security Hardening Calculators

Chapter 9 — Core Switch Security Hardening Design Guide


The following interactive calculators assist network security engineers in planning, sizing, and validating core switch security hardening deployments. Each calculator provides real-time results as inputs are adjusted, enabling rapid what-if analysis without manual computation. The five calculators cover the most common quantitative planning tasks: TCAM capacity planning, CoPP rate limit sizing, ACL entry budget estimation, hardening risk score assessment, and BGP prefix filter sizing.

TCAM Capacity Planner

Estimate total TCAM consumption across all security and forwarding features. Helps prevent TCAM exhaustion that silently disables security controls.

Full Internet table ≈ 900,000
IPv6 uses 2× TCAM vs IPv4
Each ACE uses 1–4 TCAM entries
Check platform datasheet
TCAM Utilization Analysis
TCAM Utilization 0%

CoPP Rate Limit Sizer

Calculate recommended CoPP (Control Plane Policing) rate limits for each traffic class based on your network size and routing protocol scale. Prevents CPU exhaustion while allowing legitimate control traffic.

Recommended CoPP Rate Limits (pps = packets per second)
Traffic ClassRecommended Rate (pps)Burst (pps)Action on Exceed

ACL Entry Budget Estimator

Estimate the total number of ACL entries (ACEs) required across all interface types, and check against platform TCAM limits. Helps prevent ACL budget exhaustion that leaves interfaces unprotected.

Complex ACEs may use 2–4 TCAM entries each
ACL Entry Budget Analysis
ACL TCAM Utilization 0%

Hardening Risk Score Assessor

Assess the current security hardening coverage across the eight hardening domains. Each slider represents the implementation completeness of that domain (0% = not implemented, 100% = fully implemented). The overall risk score indicates residual risk exposure.

Hardening Coverage & Residual Risk Score
Residual Risk Level
50
Low RiskMedium RiskHigh Risk

BGP Prefix Filter Sizer

Estimate the number of BGP prefix filter entries required and the TCAM impact for different BGP deployment scenarios. Helps plan TCAM allocation for BGP security controls including RPKI and prefix filtering.

Recommended: 110–130% of expected prefix count
Inbound + outbound prefix-list entries
BGP Prefix Filter & TCAM Sizing
FIB TCAM Utilization 0%